Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Weikop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Weikop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a prod on this article, but looking carefully at the publication record, I don't think he's yet notable either under WP:PROF, WP:AUTHOR, or the GNG. DGG ( talk ) 03:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - I found the 4 books and some articles, I think "yet" may be the key. EBY (talk) 03:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:06, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete -- the position is important and the book may be when it's out, but it's not yet. When it's published we can see from reviews and library holdings his impact, so no prejudice against recreation. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 21:58, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep -- He looks as if he is on his way to being a notable academic. Peterkingiron (talk) 08:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.